ISO 14443-3 PDF

Part 3 [ISO/IEC (E)] defines the initialization and anticollision protocols Note that ISO/IEC is a Contacted Integrated Circuit Card standard. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Identification ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright . The ISO/IEC describes how to select (“activate”) a single card. This card activation procedure is generally independent of the number.

Author: Voodoom Faule
Country: Burma
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 14 March 2005
Pages: 39
PDF File Size: 3.10 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.73 Mb
ISBN: 716-5-24443-617-9
Downloads: 33513
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nak

ISO/IEC 14443

I don’t fully understand it. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.

Sign up using Facebook. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Obviously, no hash is free of collisions, as long as the hash is shorter than the hashed data — but the probability of something randomly changing the hashed data to false data with 144433 same hash is so small, it can be neglected in practice.

Sign up using Email and Password. Email Required, but never shown. Nowhere in the iso standard is written that uid3 cant be 88 only uid0 cant be The Innovatron company had working microprocessor cards, so their technology was integrated as type B in the standard. Post as a guest Name. Practical standards do practical implications. This answer talks about competing technologies brought forward by two different companies: The probability that noise occurs that disrupts any communication is probably much higher!

While I believe that I read current version, I haven’t checked that. ISO anti-collision protocol is not correct Ask Question. Iiso up using Email and Password. I don’t like that you can easily fabricate this one – and it is not defined what to do in that case. This problem existed in the version of the standard and was corrected in Amendment 1 in by adding the clause:.

  DEPUY TRILOCK PDF

nfc – ISO anti-collision protocol is not correct – Stack Overflow

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Also generation of UIDs is usually not made in Crypographically friendly way e.

I’d like to understand why the ISO standard describes two types of interfaces, type A and type B. Email Required, but never shown.

This problem existed in the version of the standard and was corrected in Amendment 1 in by adding the clause: By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Post as a guest Name. Or even detect that it happend.

NTAG 216 – ISO 14443 – part 4

But nevertheless it is not correct and the general director of the company I am working for will definitely come to look at what we are doing with two such cards in his wallet. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. This separation is not relevant anymore since you can have type A or type B memory or microprocessor cards, and we ended up with two competing technologies in the same standard.

I found a nice answer to my question here: I would expect though I did not check that this is also the case for the version of the standard.

rfid – Why are there types A and B in ISO ? – Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. I do agree, this is a bad thing tm to be in a standard. Maybe in an effort to phase out type A? Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these sio. There are usually some patterns like one vendor has some prefix and then prefix of card type – So it looks to me more like somebody had bad day than calculated trough decision.

  COURS DE MACROCONOMIE S2 PDF

By 144443-3 “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Sign up using Facebook.

Am I right or did I miss something? At the time, type A couldn’t power up a microprocessor continuously.

Some limitations quickly occurred: Look at hash functions, for example. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled. So somebody will come and will start to poke into readers to see if it not isso something. Could you re-phrase this sentence: Can I find more details somewhere?

I know it is very low probability 1: I’ve been recently rewriting ISO anti-collision loop and found out that it is actually not correctly defined in the standard. Cryptography depends on an attacker not, is sheer luck, finding the right key on the first try; mechanical engineering is all “oh all these iron atoms are aranged in a neat metal grid, so the probability of a crystal fracture going through the whole steel beam supporting this skyscraper is really really small”.

1443-3 up or log in Sign up using Google.